The idea that architecture could be simply that was a new concept brought to my attention earlier this semester. Architectural examples often symbolize something outside of themselves and it is this referential aspect that somehow gave it meaning and validation. Is there a need for symbolism in architecture? Does architecture need to stand for, refer to, or represent something outside of itself? Does this usage of symbolism make it Architecture?
Geometric Symbolism
Geometric symbolism seemed to be prevalent in particular architects' work. Mies van der Rohe, Frank Lloyd Wright, Andrea Palladio, Tadao Ando, all exhibit particular attention to geometries in their architecture. This appears as a form of symbolism - but it spans more than just form. So I find myself questioning what exactly are these architects representing through their employment of strict geometries?