The idea that architecture could be simply that was a new concept brought to my attention earlier this semester. Architectural examples often symbolize something outside of themselves and it is this referential aspect that somehow gave it meaning and validation. Is there a need for symbolism in architecture? Does architecture need to stand for, refer to, or represent something outside of itself? Does this usage of symbolism make it Architecture?
Formal Symbolism
Formal symbolism is more common than I had first realized. There are countless examples of building forms that stand as representation for something other than the building - often something of relation to the buildings purpose. Does the Seafarer's Center need to be in the shape of the fish? Could it be an effective piece of architecture if were simply a box? Is the shape conducive to the functional aspects of the building?